Should governments restrict assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines?

Context

Assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines are at the centre of a long-running debate over public safety and constitutional rights. Proponents of restrictions argue these weapons enable mass casualties and have no legitimate civilian purpose, while opponents contend that the Second Amendment protects such ownership and that enforcement of existing laws is more effective than new restrictions. The issue resurfaces regularly in election cycles, particularly after mass shootings, and divides Americans along partisan and regional lines.