Should Supreme Courts have power to overturn their own precedents?

When the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, it shattered the principle of stare decisis—the legal doctrine that courts should respect precedent. Now courts worldwide face a fundamental question: should judges have the flexibility to correct what they view as wrongly decided cases, or does constant reversal of precedent undermine the rule of law itself? The stakes are enormous—if precedents aren't sacred, which other settled rights are vulnerable?